EFI University - fuel injection tuning education and training
FREE Electronic Fuel Injection Newsletter!
Feature articles, tuning tips,
and more!
 
 
EFI University
Electronic Fuel Injection Tuning Forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Dynamic Injector Flowtesting

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EFI University Forum Index -> Tuning Tips
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:11 am    Post subject: Dynamic Injector Flowtesting Reply with quote

Hey there,

We recently completed our test bench, and we are offering dynamic injector flowtesting.

The testing generates battery compensation values, minimum and maximum linear pulsewidths, optimum peak and hold currents, and just about any other important parameter that you can think of.

The details can be found on our website at

http://www.yawpower.com/injectordynamics.html

Thanks

Paul Yaw
Yaw Power Products


Last edited by injectordynamics on Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MarcoV6T



Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 147
Location: Belgium, Brussels

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, first I like to say it’s a nice spreadsheet with valuable information, if I lived a little closer I would let you test the injectors I have (I will test them in a Bosch Test Centre, here in Belgium).

One thing though I am not sure about in the spreadsheet, when I chose between batch and sequential injection, the max pulse with is doubled. Shouldn’t that be the same for both, as you only have one engine cycle (720°) to inject, be it batch or sequential? Or is the batch injection calculation based on one injection every revolution (360°), what also would explain why your max horse power numbers are lower with batch injection (2 x dead time + recovery time)?

I thought that at higher rpm, batch injection systems switches to one injection per engine cycle?

Maybe it’s something completely different, would like to know what the reason is.

Thanks,
Marc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Marco,

Hopefully the terms batch and sequential do not cause any confusion. It seems that the ECU manufacturers have slightly different terminology for describing firing arrangements.

Here in the States, Motec sets the standard (In my opinion) and so I chose to use their terminology.

Using their terminology, sequential means that each injector fires once per engine cycle.

A complete engine cycle lasts 720 crank degrees for a four stroke engine, and 360 degrees for a two stroke engine, and so we get one firing per 720 crank degrees for a four stroke engine, and one firing per 360 degrees for a two stroke engine.

Batch fire means that each injector fires twice per engine cycle.

For a four stroke engine, we would have two firings per 720 crank degrees, equaling one firing per 360 degrees. For a two stroke engine we would have 2 firings per 360 degrees, equaling one firing per 180 crank degrees.

Keeping RPM constant for the comparison, the available time per event (The period) would be halved for a batch fired engine.

The horsepower potential for a given RPM will be slightly lower with a batch fire arrangement because as you suggest, the dead time, and recovery time will be applied twice per engine revolution.

For instance, a sequential fired four stroke engine running at 6000 RPM will fire the injectors at a frequency of 50 Hz, with a resulting period of 20 milliseconds. If the combined dead time, and recovery time equals 2 milliseconds, we are left with a possible 18 millisecond effective pulsewidth per engine revolution.

If we batch fire the same engine, the injectors will be fired at a frequency of 100Hz, with a resulting period of 10 milliseconds. Subtracting our combined dead time and recovery time of 2 milliseconds, we are left with a possible 8 millisecond effective pulsewidth. Since we are firing twice per engine revolution, we double this, and get an effective 16 milliseconds of fuel flow per engine revolution which is only 88.9% of our effective fuel flow with a sequential fired engine.

I hope that answers your question, and thanks for taking the time to download the sample.

PY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MarcoV6T



Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 147
Location: Belgium, Brussels

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, well that explains it.

I am not completely sure, but I think most or some batch fire ECU's (or the aftermarket ones who have the option to chose between sequential or batch) do fire once every engine cycle at higher rpm’s, as there is no reason to fire twice anymore.

Hopefully some of the EFI guy’s will chime in and could explain how there batch fire strategy is working.

Marc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hugh



Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 394
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul,

Please can you give us an update on any developments to your injector calibration system.

Does your output provide figures that I can directly plug into my Motec M600 to get the maximum benefit from your calibration.

I also use a resistor pack on my car in line with the injectors, please advise whether the injectors should be tested by you with or without the resistor pack.

If you test without, I wonder if there might be problems in applying the results you provide.

When I set up the injectors in the Motec software, the car seemed to run best with, from memory, an injector setting of 0. This was a pure guess, will you advise the correct setting for the Motec ECU?

Thanks

Hugh
_________________
R34 GTR Nissan Skyline + twin HKS 3037S
OS Giken 3 litre block + OS Giken sequential
M600 ECU - still learning after 3 years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Hugh,

Quote:
Please can you give us an update on any developments to your injector calibration system.


I guess the recent updates are the ability to gather the information required for EFI Live and HP Tuners software, and the ability to use a 3D table in Motec's V3 software to linearize the lower non linear range of the injector.

I cannot make it as perfect as I would like because the software only allows 20 microsecond increments on the dead time compensation, and only 2 digits to the right of the decimal on the pulsewidth value.

Still, it works much better than no linearization at all. If I get a chance, I will post a screen capture of the flow before and after linearization.

It works very well on most newer high impedance injectors because they have such a nice smooth curve on the bottom end. Pintle injectors are not as good because of the dip caused by pintle bounce. Some of the newer ball style injectors exhibit the same dip due to "ball bounce???" but it is less drastic.

I havent tried it yet on the Bosch 1600's. I'm sure I can clean up the bottom end, but I certainly can't completely fix it. It would take a shovel to fill in that trough in the flow curve.

I guess some explanation is in order. The dead time compensation is only correct within the linear portion of the flow curve. If you base your compensation values on the linear portion of the curve (And you should) you will still have inaccuracies at low pulsewidths, and the closed loop will typically over correct because the slope of the curve is steeper down there. By using a 3 dimensional table in V3 with voltage on the Y Axis, and effective pulsewidth on the X Axis you can smoothly increase the compensation values at low pulsewidths to "perk up" the flow curve, getting it to lay on the same line as the linear portion of the curve which has a Y Intercept of zero.

This allows all the compensations in the ECU to work properly at low pulsewidths. The closed loop doesn't over correct and hunt, and your individual cylinder trims will actually be accurate at low pulsewidths instead of skewing the curve like they normally would.

This is not new. The OEM computers are all set up this way.

I'm also working on adding a section that takes dead time variation between injectors into account when using the individual cylinder trims. I have a working tested version, but it has not been added to the spreadhseet yet.

Quote:
Does your output provide figures that I can directly plug into my Motec M600 to get the maximum benefit from your calibration


Yes it does. I keep promising to include the ability to directly export a Motec compatible csv file, but I haven't done it yet. I'm working on the new version of the spreadsheet right now. Not sure when it will be done. Maybe next week.

Quote:
I also use a resistor pack on my car in line with the injectors, please advise whether the injectors should be tested by you with or without the resistor pack.


YIKES!!! Bad News. That will really slow your injectors down. What injectors are you using?

This reminds me that you asked about using Excel for working with some of the data from your ECU and I forgot to respond. You can do pretty much anything in Excel if you are willing to learn VBA. I have several books and they all suck. I find that the internet is much more helpful. Try Excel VBA Tutorial in Google and see what comes up. That should get you started.

Since most of this applies to Motec ECU's running V3 is there a way to move it to the Motec section?...Ben?...Anybody?

Thanks Hugh for giving me the excuse to talk about my service.
_________________
Paul Yaw
www.yawpower.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MarcoV6T



Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 147
Location: Belgium, Brussels

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not so long ago I crossed a dead time calibration file for P&H injectors with and without resistor pack, the differences in dead time where rather significant, especially at lower voltages. So it's obvious, if you want a calibration file, the test must be done with the resistor pack. First, there is the tolerance of the injectors themselves, second, the tolerance of the individual resistors. Hence each injector should be matched with his proper resistor during the test.

Honestly, I would start with installing a P&H injector controller, and remap the low load and idling maps first.

My interest for the injector flow test is mainly the difference in flow between injectors at higher duty cycles near max VE, to trim the individual cylinders at that point, sure the difference is dynamic, but as Paul stated, with the newer generation of injectors the dynamic deviation between injectors is not that big anymore, so the risk to run lean on one cylinder at a different point in the map is small.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hugh



Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 394
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks guys,

I should have said I use Bosch 1600cc injectors and the spray pattern is more like spits rather than a spray at idle duty cycle.

Do you think it is possible for the M600 to drive these injectors directly, from memory they are about 3 ohms on their own and 9 ohms with the resistor pack?

Paul,

What is the turnaround time of the service?

Thanks

Hugh
_________________
R34 GTR Nissan Skyline + twin HKS 3037S
OS Giken 3 litre block + OS Giken sequential
M600 ECU - still learning after 3 years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hugh



Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 394
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul,

Not sure if have posted this before, but I set up an injector tester to experiment with different duty cycles.

I weighed the bottle after 5minutes 2% duty cycle , 50% for two minutes etc.

It seemed to be OK but suffered greatly from battery voltage changes.

Don't fall off your seat laughing.

http://www.sol.co.uk/h/hugh/Injectors/50%20percent%20Duty%20cycle%20Flow%20Test.MPG
_________________
R34 GTR Nissan Skyline + twin HKS 3037S
OS Giken 3 litre block + OS Giken sequential
M600 ECU - still learning after 3 years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I should have said I use Bosch 1600cc injectors


Does the part number end in 846, or 839?

The M600 will have no problem running these unless it is some oddball piece. This isn't some version of a plug and play ECU that I'm not familiar with is it?

If it is a standard M600, it will run a whole row of these off a single driver with no resistor.

Let me know what you have.

Also, what fuel pressure are you running? Let me know and I will get you current settings. Are you running V3 software?
_________________
Paul Yaw
www.yawpower.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Hugh



Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 394
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul,

From memory, the injectors are a standard 839 or similar, colour is a light grey.

I use a standard Motec M600.

I currently use 3 bar base pressure, but might want to raise that to 4 bar base as I am building a competition only car just now and like to keep duty cycle down and maximise atomisation.

I am using V3 software.

Cheers

Hugh
_________________
R34 GTR Nissan Skyline + twin HKS 3037S
OS Giken 3 litre block + OS Giken sequential
M600 ECU - still learning after 3 years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Over here the 846's are off white, and the 839's are mint green. If you have the 846's, set the peak current to 2.1, and the hold current divider to 8.

Remove your resistors, and be prepared to lean out your entire map.

I don't have any data for the 839's at 3 Bar, but I do have some here, and could run them. It would not be the same as testing your injectors, but it would be better than nothing.

Sell the resistors to someone you don't like.
_________________
Paul Yaw
www.yawpower.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Hugh



Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 394
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul,

I fully intend to send you my injectors to test, so will not bother trying any other settings just now.

I bought the injectors in the USA, but am in London just now so do not have access to the injectors or paperwork.

How long do you need the injectors to carry out your analysis?

Thanks

Hugh
_________________
R34 GTR Nissan Skyline + twin HKS 3037S
OS Giken 3 litre block + OS Giken sequential
M600 ECU - still learning after 3 years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
How long do you need the injectors to carry out your analysis?


1 to 2 days depending on the work load.
_________________
Paul Yaw
www.yawpower.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pantera EFI



Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 1107
Location: So. California

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:52 am    Post subject: Tan & Mint Green 160's Reply with quote

Would it be possible for you to post your standard results for the
Tan & Mint Green, and White injectors ?

Lance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
injectordynamics



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Phoenix, AZ

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PM me Lance
_________________
Paul Yaw
www.yawpower.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EFI University Forum Index -> Tuning Tips All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

©2007 EFI University